Dr. Michael J. Katz an orthopedist regularly used as
a Referee physician by OWCP on the East coast has come under investigation
after his April 12, 2013 testimony in the labor law case of Manuel Bermejo (Bermejo vs. Amsterdam).
In addition to his examinations for OWCP, Dr. Katz
is frequently hired as an Independent Medical Examiner, (IME) and “expert
witness” by others and has testified he may make more than one million dollars
per year from this business.
OWCP claimants often complain that the physicians
hired by OWCP do not actually perform examinations and/or spend very little
time performing the examination. Yet these physicians often produce wide-ranging
reports containing opinion and results of tests never performed.
Although not an OWCP claimant, this was the case
for Mr. Bermejo. Dr. Katz testified that according to his notes, his first
examination of Mr. Bermejo lasted 45 minutes. Dr. Katz testified that his
second examination of Mr. Bermejo lasted 10-20 minutes. Mr. Bermejo and his
attorney, who attended the examinations, indicated Dr. Katz’ examinations
lasted about five minutes.
For the second examination Dr. Katz performed on
Mr. Bermejo, a secret video was made by Mr. Bermejo's attorney. The recording
indicated Dr. Katz spent one minute fifty six seconds examining Mr. Bermejo.
Queens Supreme Court Justice Duane Hart, the judge
in Mr. Bermejo’s case stated;
“He testified as to findings that he obviously
could not have had in a minute and fifty six seconds.”
Justice Hart also stated;
“It is that the tape shows that he didn’t do the
tests that he spent a considerable period of time talking about that he did.
That is the perjury. Yes, didn’t do the tests. It is not just me saying it. It
is not just the plaintiff saying it. The defendants are saying it too. Does
your client really think if the insurance industry or some of the insurance
companies that hired him before when they find out that he lied, do you really
think they are going near him?”
This is not the first time a Justice has been
concerned with Dr. Katz’ testimony. In a case in Brooklyn approximately a year
before the Bermejo case, Justice Francois Rivera stated he was;
“Satisfied that this witness is less than
forthcoming” and was concerned Dr. Katz was; “Materially misleading the court.”
In light of the information, Justice Hart declared
a mistrial and ordered a new trial for Mr. Bermejo, scheduled for September 09,
2013.
On July 08, 2013 Dr. Katz did not show up for his
appearance in court in front of Justice Hart
Justice Hart offered Dr. Katz the option of leaving
his lucrative IME business. After Dr. Katz refused, Justice Hart sent the
matter to the District Attorney with a recommendation perjury charges be filed
against Dr. Katz.
On July 01, 2013, the court ordered the trial
transcripts be forwarded for further investigation to the Queens Administrative
Judge for civil contempt of court for perjury, to the Queens District Attorney
for prosecution for perjury against Dr. Katz and referred Dr. Katz to the New York
Department of Health to evaluate his capability to continue to practice
medicine.
As of July 01, 2013, Dr. Katz continued to work performing
examinations.
This is why it is so important to research the
referee physician and when necessary, file complaints against the physician
with OWCP. There must not be even the appearance of bias against the claimant
in an OWCP-directed Referee examination.
You can read the July
08, 2013 transcript here:
Some of the
web sites Dr. Katz is listed as an “expert witness:
http://www.experts.com/Expert-Witnesses/Orthopaedic-Expert-Michael-Katz
Thank you for finding this information out. I'm hoping it will help me with my 5th reconsideration. Katz ordered me back to work years ago saying my conditions had totally resolved. This after a 5 minute "exam".
ReplyDeleteI agree with some of the other comments about this data.
ReplyDeleteorthopaedic clinic morristown
I was seen by a Referee doctor for the second time and was surprise to see he was paid a substantial amount of money.(9108.00).It was more than the first referee doctor (643.00) and more than my schedule award. Is there anything I can do about that?
ReplyDeleteThis is part of the problem with OWCP's physicians. They're paid an enormous amount of money which keeps them doing reports for OWCP.
ReplyDeleteYou could file a complaint, but I wouldn't expect it to go anywhere. OWCP likes using physicians that tell them what they want to hear and the physicians like cashing those big fat checks.