~DONATIONS GREATLY APPRECIATED~






Friday, October 11, 2019

ATTENTION TSA OFFICERS


As an alternative to AFGE, ONE TSA was created by TSA Officers, FOR TSA Officers. No locals larger than us, no money rerouted to other causes, no blind adherence to partisan politics. OUR people, OUR power, OUR message in OUR OWN words.



ONE TSA is currently representing TSA Officers in airports around the country.

Our experienced Board is well versed in the CBA, grievance, and arbitration process, as well as the current benefits they individually fought for on behalf of TSA Officers.

To provide complete employment coverage, we have contracted with LEOS Protection, a nationwide legal defense plan with extensive experience defending TSA employees in areas such as disciplinary actions, grievances, OWCP claims, EEOC claims and Disability Retirement.

In addition, our experienced Director of Legislative Affairs will push forward our issues while educating lawmakers about the job we do.

Finally, funds will be returned to the workforce via programs such as scholarships and benevolent assistance.

For more information or to join, visit our website: https://onetsa.org/join

Tuesday, July 30, 2019

OWCP-Lawyers, Representation And A New “Game” In Town


I’ve written about a lot of the pitfalls of being an OWCP claimant and how it’s not just OWCP that takes advantage of you.

I recently heard about a “consulting” business for the legal side of an OWCP claim, the representation side. To me, this appears to be a new way for someone to make money off claimants trying to get help with their OWCP claims.

Although this particular business has been running since January 2018 (more than a year and a half), the website has almost no content, including exactly what they do and how they do it.

My guess, because who knows, is this business takes a monthly fee from OWCP representatives like me and then they funnel people like you to my business. Or it could be they take a monthly fee from those who need these services, such as unions and associations.

Or it could be both. This way they’d be paid both coming and going; by those like me who do the work and those like unions with claimants that need the work.

This plops someone into your lap to handle your claim, without knowing they’re not qualified until it’s too late. The consulting firm doing this gets paid and has no liability in how your claim is handled or who it’s handled by. They just cash checks and make money.

But here’s the thing, that means that people like you, the claimants, have no idea who they’re getting or the depth of their skill and quality of their work. As long as someone can pay the monthly fee, the representative gets claimants sent to them whether the representative is qualified or not.

For example, I know of a newly formed association that offers legal services to its members. An attorney with minimal experience in federal employment law handles the majority of their legal issues.

This attorney’s background is in tax, property, and general law. This attorney was hired, not because of skill and experience, not because they are the most qualified, but because they are a friend of the person who formed the association.

If you’re a federal employee with a legal issue, the last thing you want is someone learning on the fly. Federal employees come up against agencies who have their own legal teams, who are prepared, experienced and willing to play dirty, to lie and cheat.

Do you really want your representation to be someone who handled your divorce? Who wrote the appeal for your property tax problem? Who just started handling OWCP claims? Or is new at disciplinary actions? If your representation isn’t experienced, the agencies will know that and will roll right over them.

At the end of the day, these people go home with no adverse effect to their lives. That is not necessarily how it goes for the employee whose life is adversely affected by the issue they’re dealing with, whether that’s an OWCP claim or another federal employment issue.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m all for making money, but I do have a problem when claimants are taken advantage of or spend money and don’t get what they paid for. When they're told someone is good, but they're not. But it seems to me that anyone reputable, who knows what they’re doing doesn’t need to have claimants funneled to them by a "consulting" firm.

People can put out information that makes them sound experienced. Information that convinces you of their knowledge, qualifications, and skill. 

But remember what’s on someone’s website is designed to get your business, to get them paid and isn’t necessarily the truth. Someone can advertise their skill and experience with federal employment law and/or OWCP when in reality they have little or no experience.

As we know, many people who handle OWCP claims are less than knowledgeable and care more about your bank account rather than helping you. This ends up costing the claimant money they don’t have and delaying the issues of their claim even more.

Most claimants don’t know how OWCP works or how to fight them and many hire help. Unfortunately, sometimes claimants don’t know the person they hired isn’t competent until it’s too late. As an example, the most well-known OWCP attorney, who does a lot of advertising, has the worst win record of anyone handling OWCP claims. 

OWCPland is a broken, complicated system with a lot of different variables. It is not something you can just easily learn and just because you learn it, doesn't mean you're good at it. 

If you’re going to hire someone or have someone assigned to you, you want the best you can find and while there are many who take on the OWCP beast, there are very few that are not only good at it, but have the claimant’s best interest in mind.

So how can you protect yourself?

Whether you’re looking on your own or your union/association is “assigning” someone, start by asking questions, who is the person? Is it just one representative or a revolving door?

Once you know their name check them out yourself. Even some unions and associations fall into the same traps as claimants. Some don’t care who you end up with. Some believe what they’re told by the people who are selling their services. 

Some may be using this “consulting” firm to give them an “expert” because they believe the "consulting" firm has done the checking for them.

Some see the popular ones who spend the most on advertising and assume they must be good at what they do.

Once you have the name(s) you can easily Google them and see if there are any reviews, see if people are talking about them and what they’re saying.

Go to their Facebook page and read the reviews. Is anything written? If not, it’s very likely that “Five Star” review was done by a friend or family member who was asked to leave a “Five Star” review so they look good.

Most (not all) people who leave a review write something that says how the person helped them or didn’t help them. But if someone has multiple reviews/recommendations and none of them have anything written, that’s a red flag those reviews/recommendations aren't legitimate.

Is there more than one “Five Star” review left on the same day? That’s a clue the review may not be legitimate because it’s rare to get more than one legitimate review on the same day. I’m not saying it doesn’t happen, just that it’s fishy especially if nothing is written in review.

Go one further, look at their personal Facebook page if they have one. See who likes their posts; are any of those people the same people leaving those “Five Star” reviews? Are the "reviewers" on their friends list?

In the case of the attorney I mentioned above, in addition to more than one review on the same day, every “Five Star” review and recommendation was done by someone who appears to be a friend from their personal Facebook page and not a single word is written in “review” of the attorney. 

No one, not even the best can guarantee a win but in the case of OWCP, you need someone who knows what they’re doing. Someone who cares about more than just your bank account. 

I’m not going to mention this ‘consulting’ business by name so they get no advertising, but if you are a member of a union or association (especially a newly formed one) and they "assign" you someone for legal services as part of your dues, don’t rely on their choices without doing some homework of your own and that doesn’t just apply to OWCP.

Should you want to see my Facebook page, here's the link: 

Tuesday, June 25, 2019

OWCP Schedule Awards-Pay Rate Dates

OWCP uses the following information when determining the pay rate date of a schedule award: 
Legend:
DOI=Date of Injury
DDB=Date Disability Began
DOR=Date of Recurrence
DMI=Date of Maximum Medical Improvement
DLE=Date of Last Exposure
Traumatic Injury Claims -
With prior disability:
Pay Rate Date = DOI, DDB, or DOR (whichever is greatest)
SA Start Date = DMI 
Without prior disability:
Pay Rate Date = DOI
SA Start Date = DMI
Occupational Disease Claims -
With prior disability, working full duty (still exposed to injurious work factors) at time of rating exam:
Pay Rate Date = DOI, DDB, or DOR (whichever is greatest)
    (DOI = Date of Last Exposure = Date of Impairment rating exam)
SA Start Date = DMI
With prior disability, not working or working limited duty at time of rating exam:
Pay Rate Date = DOI, DDB, or DOR (whichever is greatest)
SA Start Date = DMI
Without prior disability:
Pay Rate Date = DOI 
    (DOI = DLE = Last date exposed to causal employment factors in full-duty capacity or date of medical exam if still exposed)
SA Start Date = DMI
Occupational Hearing Loss and Asbestosis Claims -
When claimant is disabled due to occupational hearing loss or asbestosis:
Pay Rate Date = DOI, DDB, or DOR (whichever is greatest)
SA Start Date = DMI
When there is no disability, claimant has continuing exposure:
Pay Rate Date = DOI 
    (DOI = DLE = date of last exposure before diagnostic exam - audiogram/chest x-ray)
SA Start Date = DMI
When there is no disability, retired:
Pay Rate Date = DOI
    (DOI = date of retirement or last documented date of exposure to hazardous noise or asbestos)
SA Start Date = DMI